You are so right. And, correct, too.
We (the formerly productive folks) are all up the creek or soon to be so. Making, or in the recent past having made, “too much” eliminates the non-preferred class from any benefits to refinance, get reduced school lunches, etc.
Not that we want it; we (or at least a lot of us) now need it. We will swallow our pride to care for our kids.
But, sorry, you chump, you made over 100 grand in 2007.
Everything zero does is calculated to redistribute wealth.
Everything. Those who call him stupid are incorrect. He knows precisely what he is doing.
Age discrimination is rampant in my field, as I suppose it is elsewhere. But, just as those over 50 and unemployed are totally screwed, so are the youngsters just entering the workforce with a debt that is close to impossible to imagine much less pay off.
Where is AARP?
Kidding.
I know where that leftist bunch is; it is busy adoring zero.
I am beginning to think that communes in rural areas will be the only hope for many of us.
As to helping our distressed FRiends, I’m all for it. I have a job for now, and could help. But how? I currently give about $500 a month to people I know need the help. That would be my retirement money, but they need help now. I never give to organized charities except for the Catholic Relief Fund, and I’m not Catholic. It’s only that the % of money with that organization actually going where it should is vastly superior to left wing greed-driven organs like United Way.
We are getting what we deserve as a body politic; Obama is a socialist and, in my opinion, he is an anti-American racist.
I fear for my children.
Actually, it’s the “Catholic Relief Services” (CRS) not “fund.”
As of 2007, 94% of the money went to poor folks. Only 6% for admin., salaries, fund raising, etc.
I commend CRS for your consideration.
After all, if we wait on the liberals, I mean the Leftists, to help poor people, it’ll be like waiting for Godot.