[gidget7]

This should serve as a prime example to ALL states saying they don't need an amendment since their DOMA has not been challenged. Same goes for Fed. Amendment. They should be done to prevent the challenge to DOMA’s.

Instead, in many states and federally, legislators sat back and let them frame it as a civil rights issue, when it isn't one. A legitimate civil right does not infringe upon the real civil rights of others.

[fwdude]

I'm afraid the few remaining states that have mere laws on their books defining real marriage are going to wake up too late to do much about the onslaught of these well-funded homo-activists. As a few more fall by judicial fiat, against the express wishes of those states’ citizens, I'm sure others will scramble to implement their own amendments. But the momentum of the courts’ recent decisions will be with the moral anarchists, and we can expect more and more successful challenges to implementing these amendments.