To: tgusa
A comparison of 0s strongly approve percentage to the percentage of Americans who dont pay any net income tax No jobs = no tax payers.
No taxpayers = no social program funding.
No social program funding = no welfare checks.
To: concerned about politics
I respectfully disagree. Geithner will just crank up the printing presses at Treasury.
36 posted on
04/03/2009 7:44:01 AM PDT by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: concerned about politics
No taxpayers = no social program funding. No social program funding = no welfare checks. If California got to the point where they had no choice except to abolish many social programs due to lack of revenue, it might just turn into a wakeup call for Obama supporters in the rest of the country.
Look for Obama and the Dems to do everything they can to prevent California's impending collapse.
44 posted on
04/03/2009 7:49:14 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: concerned about politics
No jobs = no tax payers. No taxpayers = no social program funding. No social program funding = no welfare checks. Where have you been? Just because the government doesn't have money does not mean they quit spending it.
Has anyone tried to run the budget and debt numbers on a calculator? The numbers don't fit. You have to use scientific numbers to divide the debt to taxpayer ratio (or a computer).
57 posted on
04/03/2009 7:56:18 AM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(We may officially be too stupid to govern ourselves.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson