No “chafe” involved. I know that no properly formed logical theorem was intended. However, that faulty usage is merely emblematic of the overall sorry state of the discipline that is called creation science. Creation is a matter of faith and coexists with science in all fields, including evolution. Creation requires no phony science to support it, nor should it countenance the small but annoying band of guerilla-like militants touting its scientific accuracy and making the rest of Christianity appear feeble-minded by association.
Well, that statement does not involve rigorous logic. I think it even delves into the region of logical fallacy.
Whatever your feelings are about creation science, information theory, even in a populist and informal form, is not creation science. Seeking an acceptable definition of information and how it is generated seems to be a valuable endeavor. Again, even in a conjectural arena.