[Kansas58]

Maybe this IS the way to go!

The Jury says, “Ya, it is because of what you said, and you can not be fired for what you said. However, we HATE what you said” -—

IF that is how they feel, this is a way to resolve it.

However, had I been on the Jury, I would have said he was fired for being a complete fraud and phony. He is not an Indian. He steals most of his written material. He does not have the credentials he has claimed.

BECAUSE of his controversial statements, the University did more research on this nut case.

[stylin19a]

Problem still is, regardless of the jury award, once the jury finds for the plaintiff, the judge gets to decide if he gets back pay or his job back.

[okie01]

However, had I been on the Jury, I would have said he was fired for being a complete fraud and phony. He is not an Indian. He steals most of his written material. He does not have the credentials he has claimed.

Time for the University to play hardball. Sue Churchill for having misrepresented himself as being of native American descent.

[GeronL]

and you can not be fired for what you said

at least if your a leftist