Soooooooooooooo fascinating, TaraP et al . . .
here we have a case where the radar tapes and other proofs and testimony are quite exceedingly solid.
Yet, when
FACED WITH SOLID INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS
the best a leading naysayer can respond with is utter illogical, irrational, unmitigatedly clueless hogwash YET AGAIN.
Fascinating. What a study in psychology!
Sometimes I have to wonder what subterranean cognitive caverns were dredged to arrive at such startlingly uninformed postulations. It’s embarrassing in their behalf. I keep wanting to find a cover like Noah’s sons and cover up such naked ignorance.
Youjnknnow what is most convincing to me on that tape? The tone of voice by those military pilots talking to the tower...and the answer they got
They had obviously been briefed about what happened to JAL
Hi Quix, you were saying — “FACED WITH SOLID INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS”
—
The problem I have with this kind of stuff is not the fact of a bunch of people seeing something — but rather — *what* it is that they are seeing. That’s more important to me and it’s simply “unidentified” — and there are *no facts* as to what various things are, which happen to be seen from time to time. The only “facts” (it seems to this day) is simply in the area of “something was seen”... and that’s about it.
And so, the “rest of it” — is not “fact” but a whole bunch of speculation about what it actually is that was seen. That’s what is *not fact* — in all these matters.
Now, you know what I think they are, but I’m not bringing that up here. And I’ve been catching myself up on all sorts of other theories and “speculations” as to what others think these things are.
I don’t think they are aliens from other advanced space civilizations coming here to visit earth and happen to be sighted by earthlings, as they flit about, from here to there. AND, for that — there is *absolutely no proof* or facts on that particular speculation. That’s the speculation that I’m resistant to — not the fact of “seeing something”...