“1. Palin
2. Jindal
3. Romney “
That you put Palin or Jindal ahead of Romney speaks volumes for your anti-Romney bigotry. So what if he’s Mormon and has changed his views on abortion (remember Reagan did too???).
Face the facts: Palin made a superb teleprompter speech at the Repub Convention, but she’s a woefully PATHETIC speaker. In that respect, she’s like Obutthole, but not even nearly as good of a speaker & b.s. artist as he is. She NEEDS A TELEPROMPTER. The media made mincemeat out of her. Do you want that to happen again? In spite of her good values, PALIN is unelectable.
Next time around, it makes sense to put an articulate speaker up for the job.
Romney’s ability to speak intelligently without notes/teleprompter and his understanding of business and finance should have made him a shoe-in for the job.
Jindal is another unelectable weakling (witness his recent bad speech.
I sure hope Romney runs in 2012 and, like those of us who were not pleased initially by Reagan, but then were won over by him, you will be too (if you can get past your stubborn anti-Romney anti-Mormon bigotry)...
I spent 15 minutes talking to Reagan in his office once. Romney has the same characteristics as Reagan did. Open your minds.
Did you know that FLDS/LDS "Prophet" Joeseph Smith once "prophecied" that There were men on the moon ?
You can call all the names you want...Bigot, Alinsky follower etc, BUT THE COLD HARD FACT IS THAT THE MEDIA WILL EAT ANY MORMON ALIVE....and we will be forced to stcik up for his CULT, like it or not.
The Mormons claimed that Joseph Smith's power as a "seer" extended even beyond the earth. In February 1881 Oliver B. Huntington recorded the following in his journal:
" Inhabitants of the Moon are more of a uniform size than the inhabitants of the Earth, being about 6 feet in height. They dress very much like the quaker Style & are quite general in Style, or the one fashion of dress. They live to be very old; comeing [sic] generally, near a thousand years."
But...they didn't. Even though Romney -- whom I supported -- was running against the most unsatisfactory GOP candidate since, maybe, Thomas Dewey (realize that Bob Dole never supported CFR or amnesty, etc.).
Romney supporters now need to ask themselves "Why?" Why couldn't Mitt Romney beat John McCain, of all people.
Personally, I gave Romney's conversion to conservatism the benefit of the doubt. Nor am I bothered by his Morman faith, not at all.
But, by his "striking a bi-partisan tone" and supporting Obama, while arguing for amnesty, Romney has now totally disqualified himself. On some watershed conservative issues, he has become another McCain -- whom he failed to beat in the firt place.
It's time for us to turn to fresh talent. Palin, Jindal...or somebody yet to emerge.
While Romney may have some of the same characteristics as Reagan, Palin has the same political philosophy and she isn't embarassed by it. That is why she has resonated with conservatives while most conservatives don't trust Romney. She is a genuine true believer in Reaganism while Romney will grasp or cast it aside as is expedient in the moment.
Jindal's #2.
Rommey, my choice in 08, has peaked. He started too early in 08 and is not now as interesting as he once was. He's a fine man, but now just another Gingrich.
It has NOTHING to do with his Mormon faith. It has EVERYTHING to do with his RINO philosophy.