Posted on 03/31/2009 9:55:05 AM PDT by Evil Slayer
With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more aggressive in asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U.S. Navy seems to have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.
After years of conjecture, details have begun to emerge of a "kill weapon" developed by the Chinese to target and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.
First posted on a Chinese blog viewed as credible by military analysts and then translated by the naval affairs blog Information Dissemination, a recent report provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) that can strike carriers and other U.S. vessels at a range of 2000km.
The range of the modified Dong Feng 21 missile is significant in that it covers the areas that are likely hot zones for future confrontations between U.S. and Chinese surface forces.
The size of the missile enables it to carry a warhead big enough to inflict significant damage on a large vessel, providing the Chinese the capability of destroying a U.S. supercarrier in one strike.
Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature and a maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds that it can evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is estimated that the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range of 2000km in less than 12 minutes.
Supporting the missile is a network of satellites, radar and unmanned aerial vehicles that can locate U.S. ships and then guide the weapon, enabling it to hit moving targets.
(Excerpt) Read more at usni.org ...
I’m still trying to wrap my mind around the fact that we are extending preferential trade status to a country that is working on ways to militarily attack us.
Substitute “The Clintons” for we.
It wouldn’t be necessary to use a nuke to take out the Three Gorges Dam; two or three well-placed cruise missiles with bunker-buster warheads would do the trick, I would think. Or we could fire 10 or more just to be sure...
Corrected link (not a secure website, http:// not https:// ):
http://www.usni.org/forthemedia/ChineseKillWeapon.asp
From the article:
“The Navy’s reaction is telling, because it essentially equals a radical change in direction based on information that has created a panic inside the bubble. For a major military service to panic due to a new weapon system, clearly a mission kill weapon system, either suggests the threat is legitimate or the leadership of the Navy is legitimately unqualified. There really aren’t many gray spaces in evaluating the reaction by the Navy…the data tends to support the legitimacy of the threat.”
I’m thinking the Chinese would suffer a loss of millions of people a lot better than we would.
Do you really believe the Teleprompter in Chief would give that order?
I’m pretty sure 0bama won’t be in office long enough to witness such a scenrio...unless he makes himself “President for Life”...
I thought the 3M-54 Klub (SS-N-27 Sizzler) was their ‘carrier killer.’
scenario!
I thought the 3M-54 Klub (SS-N-27 Sizzler) was their ‘carrier killer.’
So would a coordinated multi-pronged attack by General Zod and his malignant Krypton horde.
Good thing Obama wants to kill missile defense. Since the only way to defeat a military the size of China’s is a nuclear exchange, we sure wouldn’t want to be able to survive it.
“I agree with you but one must remember who is the Commander in Chief these days. Would he have the guts to use a nuke?”
Given a continuous communization of the US and desecration of the Constitution, the possibility of a future military insurrection in the US is not out of the question, IMO.
I do wonder if, perhaps with the exclusion of submarines, the days of naval warfare are coming to a close. Ships are just too big, too easy to find, and too slow. Will future wars be fought mainly in the air and space?
At mach 10 ?? 7 kmph?? hardly. They claim 12 minutes.
And we are converting Boomers to carry Seals and standard missiles. whoopy
It is called a submarine.
2 more:
Standard Missile
We shot at, and hit, a freakin' junk satellite outside the atmosphere.
Is this new missile a threat? Of course.
Is it a threat that we cannot handle? Is it a game-changer? No.
And finally, one of the great quotes of all time:
ADM Arleigh Burke, 1991 (Regarding the USS Arleigh Burke)
This ship is built to fight. You had better know how.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.