Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Chinese Develop Special "Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft Carriers
U. S. Naval Institute ^ | 3/31/09

Posted on 03/31/2009 9:55:05 AM PDT by Evil Slayer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: agere_contra
They sank an aircraft-carrier sized container ship (the "Atlantic Conveyor") but never got near the real targets.

The Argentinian Sub San Luis got multiple close range shots at the British Carriers, but because of a fault in their fire control system (someone cleaning contacts had switched two wires) all the torpedoes missed.

The British never came anywhere close to finding the San Luis and dropped over 100 torpedoes on assorted whales, etc. that they thought might be submarines.

101 posted on 03/31/2009 12:12:23 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

For the light beam itself this is true. But for the beam steering and tracking systems, it’s not trivial.


102 posted on 03/31/2009 12:13:45 PM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
"We shot at, and hit, a freakin' junk satellite outside the atmosphere.

I believe that satellite was traveling greater than Mach 17 (roughly 12,000 MPH). I think most satellites above LEO travel at speeds in excess of 17,000 MPH. If we can hit that, we can hit anything.

103 posted on 03/31/2009 12:14:45 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
This is different from the Sunburn anti-ship missiles they’ve brought from the Russians?

As many people have pointed out, these are BALLISTIC missiles that are traveling out of the atmosphere for most of their flight. Nothing like previous anti-ship missiles.

104 posted on 03/31/2009 12:17:00 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
I think most satellites above LEO travel at speeds in excess of 17,000 MPH. If we can hit that, we can hit anything.

Satellites are much easier than an incoming IRBM or ICBM that may be launching decoys, etc.

Satellites have predictable, repeatable orbits you've tracked for months beforehand.

105 posted on 03/31/2009 12:18:03 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
The question is “How would we respond?” Like “Nuke our fleet and 3 Gorges dam is GONE

Why are you assuming these missles are armed with nukes?

106 posted on 03/31/2009 12:20:44 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
"Satellites have predictable, repeatable orbits you've tracked for months beforehand.

You are undoubtedly correct. But, that satellite's orbit had already begun to decay and I believe the satellite had started to tumble. But still, that would be much easier than hitting something that was only airborne for a few minutes. Hopefully, the missile shield technology can adapt.

107 posted on 03/31/2009 12:24:54 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

uh, yeah, sniper63, you took the words right out of my mouth, I was thinking the exact same thing! I’m working on the math as we speak...let me know what you get first and I’ll tell you if you’re right. ;o)


108 posted on 03/31/2009 12:31:42 PM PDT by Paco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman
I am amazed at the number of Americans that continue to underestimate the ability of our enemies to think outside the box and be creative enough to defeat us. I am also amazed at the number of Americans that continue to overestimate the USA’s resolve and military power. A news flash - World War 2 was over a long time ago. Our current enemies are highly creative, almost as technologically sophisticated as we are (in some technologies they already lead), they are blessed with a huge advantage in manufacturing and manpower, they have overwhelming numbers of sometimes simple but effective weapons (as compared to our handful of smart weapons), and they are not hamstrung with political correctness and a self-hating political leadership. Some of you folks will still be blinded to this reality right up until the point that you get vaporized. And, while our enemies are dramatically improving their capabilities, we are a shadow of our former selves and our military and nuclear deterrent capability has been in radical decline since Daddy Bush was in office. The US hasn't fielded a new nuclear weapon in what, 2 decades? We have scrapped all of our Peacekeeper ICBM’s? These are only a few of the examples. I suggest some of you people regroup and reevaluate our security situation. The enemy is preparing for a checkmate, and it appears that we are not only allowing it to happen, but we are actually assisting in our own destruction. Repeat after me, the Islamic/terrorist enemy can do great damage to us, but only the clenched fist of Russia and China have the ability to annihilate the USA. Food for thought.

I'm reposting your comment. One of the best arguments I have read in a long, long time. Right to the point and accurate. Americans have become full of apathy and relying on past accomplishments to keep the warm and fuzzy feeling of security.

We are going to have our ass** handed to us one day unless we get out heads out of the sand regarding China.

109 posted on 03/31/2009 12:39:06 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
"Yeah, no kidding. My thoughts exactly. That’s 7,414.5 / MPH"

If it hit anywhere on the side of a ship at that speed it would make a hole in the side big enough to drive another ship through.

110 posted on 03/31/2009 12:40:41 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (will work for bailout bonus.... Twitter: maddawggmorgan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
This is different from the Sunburn anti-ship missiles they’ve brought from the Russians?

Sunburn is <100 mile sea skimming cruise missile. This is a very long range ballistic missile.

111 posted on 03/31/2009 12:42:15 PM PDT by SampleMan (Socialism and Liberty are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
It wouldn’t be necessary to use a nuke to take out the Three Gorges Dam; two or three well-placed cruise missiles with bunker-buster warheads would do the trick, I would think. Or we could fire 10 or more just to be sure...

You think this president is going to smash a public works project and drown 100s of thousands of civilians, displace millions from their homes....in retaliation for the Chicom Navy taking out what Obama probably considers an evil legacy of imperialist aggression (a carrier group)?

You're insane. Obama will send them a combo apology/thank you note.

112 posted on 03/31/2009 12:48:10 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Well, IRBMs aren’t doing Mach 10 at the surface after re-entry; more like Mach 7, IRRC.

You wouldn’t want to be hit by even a nerf football or a Q-tip doing that speed.


113 posted on 03/31/2009 12:48:50 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Yup. I think they’re nukes.
I don’t think the Chinese can hit a moving flight deck with a projectile from a ballistic missile; I don’t know if we can. The radius of error is too large.


114 posted on 03/31/2009 1:37:53 PM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

(heh)


115 posted on 03/31/2009 2:12:05 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: bikerman
Will this affect my stock in Walmart?

I hope people keep shopping there.

I quite shopping their years ago

But what about those great Walmart specials?

:o

116 posted on 03/31/2009 4:03:16 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Do you believe we would hit their cities with nukes in this case? I dunno, assuming in a coldblooded way the loss of 5-6000 US navy men, would the population of the US countenance the killing of millions of Chinese?

And one blond.

117 posted on 03/31/2009 4:29:06 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 71 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
I’m still trying to wrap my mind around the fact that we are extending preferential trade status to a country that is working on ways to militarily attack us.

The banksters demand it..And when everything goes completely south with Red China and it will, the banksters will make even more money when they demand a war to save their bottom lines.

118 posted on 03/31/2009 4:53:34 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
"A reminder that fire one of these advance missiles and guess what will happen. Shortest war in history."

Not while oscumbo is our benevolent emperor.

119 posted on 03/31/2009 7:22:09 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Right now, the chinese have the high ground.

They know the current squatter in the White House would not dare to retaliate with unconventional weapons against them should they destroy one of our carriers. It's just not going to happen.

Every enemy we have is emboldened to mischief and it can all be laid back in the lap of emperor bammy and the damned fools who were gulled into believing his mantra of hopechange.

This nation is in grave danger every second that sneering scoundrel infests the oval office.

120 posted on 03/31/2009 7:40:53 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson