Replies

Let's compare your words to those of your Islamic-Creationist mentor, shall we?

The words of GGG:

I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that Harun Yahya et al are performing a wonderful service re: the War on Terror.
When Muslim’s become creationists, they tend to openly and publicly denounce terror carried out in the name of Islam. As such, the more Muslims who become creationists (even if it’s of the Muslim variety) the more that helps the US and its allies in the War on Terror.
Actually, the majority of radical Islamist terrorists despise creation, and are materialist to the core. . . . All of them are hardcore Commie-Materialists who worship at the alter of evolutionary materialism . . .

Harun Yahya must be proud of you, GGG. Here you've reiterated perfectly his fraudulent and bizarre Islamic apologetics. For example, in Mr. Yahya's screed entitled "Islam Is Not The Source of Terrorism, But Its Solution", we find an overflowing bucket of the very bilge-water that you are carrying for him:

The words of Mr. Yahya:

One point that should be stressed at the outset is that the identities of the perpetrators of the acts of terrorism which targeted the United States are not yet determined. There is a chance that these horrible attackers are linked to quite different centres. It may well be a communist organization harboring rage and hatred against American values, a fascist organization opposing federal administration or a secret faction in another state. Even though the hijackers have Muslim identities, the questions regarding by whom and for what purposes these people were used will probably remain to be a mystery. . . .
[W]hile looking for the perpetrators of a terrorist act, its origins should be sought in disbelief rather than in religion. People with a fascist, communist, racist or materialist outlook on life should be suspected as potential perpetrators. The name or the identity of the triggerman is not important. . . .
Actually, the materialist, irreligious philosophies and ideologies that prevailed in the 19th century are responsible for these dismal acts. . . . At the roots of the greatest brutalities of the 19th century lies the Social Darwinist ideology. . . . As a matter of fact, the main disagreement is not between the West and Islam. Contrary to the general opinion, it is between the religious people of the West and of the Muslim world on the one hand, and the people opposing religion (like materialists and atheists) on the other.
Support should be provided for the spread of "True Islam", which is a religion of love, friendship, peace and brotherhood, and for its true understanding by Islamic societies.

And in the surreal interview that Mr. Adnan Oktar (qua Harun Yahya) gave to Azernews, which he subsequently posted on his equally surreal HarunYahya.Tv website as "AN INTERVIEW WITH MR. ADNAN OKTAR BY AZERNEWS (October 23, 2008)", we hear your esteemed Islamic-Creationist mentor say:

“But what is even more interesting is that Darwinists have not a single transitional form fossil they can use. They have not a single fossil they can call a transitional form to prove Darwinism. What kind of theory is that? It is total nonsense, a complete lie. Can you have a theory with absolutely zero supporting evidence? You may say that something is a theory if there are two or three bits of evidence for it. But this one has none, no evidence at all. And it is total nonsense.”
"All those who perpetrated the September 11 attacks were people who had received a Darwinist, materialist and atheist education, who had been educated in Europe and who held materialist views. Their identity papers may describe them as Muslims, but that is irrelevant...”
“It was the Masons who controlled Saddam. They used him, and then cast him off like an old shoe. They first used him in massacres, but Saddam was nothing without Masonic support. He could do nothing.”
“The public imagine that Masons are perfectly rational people, but they are actually materialists and this and that. They are people who directly worship Shaytan.” “But Shaytan cannot vanquish the followers of Allah. The prophets were followers of Allah, for instance, and could not be vanquished”
“The whole question is one of being a supporter of Allah. The supporters of Allah are invincible. So long as we genuinely love Allah, are genuinely on His side, fear Allah and genuinely believe in Allah, then we can never be laid low.”
“These things happen in cold, materialist politics. There are no such problems in politics in which religious faith and love prevail.”

As Mr. Yahya's "Baghdad Bob" you are truly doing a stellar job of spreading his whopping lies, but the question remains: How did an Islamic apologist like you find such a comfortable and prominent home at Freerepublic?

How did an Islamic apologist like you find such a comfortable and prominent home at Freerepublic?

Sowing.

Yes, GGG is well into “truther” territory with his ‘it was cult of Darwin fanatics who are responsible for terror’ revisionism.

I imagine a less intelligent Laura Richmond “The movement “Islamic Jihad” is neither Islamic or Jihadist; discuss amongst yourselves.”

Re: atlaw's reply in #40 ==Atlaw writes: Let's compare your words to those of your Islamic-Creationist mentor, shall we?)

Atlaw is being deliberately disingenuous. He is so consumed by hatred for biblical creationists that he will do anything, no matter how sick, no matter how twisted, no matter how morally repugnant...to include falsely linking Christians to Islamist Terrorists..

This all began, when atlaw falsely tried to imply that the Muslim creationist, Harun Yahya , is somehow my mentor.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2218326/posts?page=36#24

I replied to this unfounded accusation with the following:

“I worship Jesus Christ, the Creator of the Universe and everything in it. However, I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that Harun Yahya et al are performing a wonderful service re: the War on Terror. When Muslim’s become creationists, they tend to openly and publicly denounce terror carried out in the name of Islam. As such, the more Muslims who become creationists (even if it’s of the Muslim variety) the more that helps the US and its allies in the War on Terror. It also increases the likelihood that many of those same Muslims will become Christians, for they will find that the first Creationists-proper were all BIBLICAL creationists. Once they realize that their creationist ideas came from Christendom, this will cause many of them to pause and compare the Qu’ran to the Bible. Once they realize that the Qur’an is inferior to the Bible, some of those very same seekers will come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. As such, many souls will be saved, and it will help us win hearts and minds in the War on Terror even more once they realize the Jews are God’s chosen people (and doubly so once they realize that their Lord and Savior was born a Jew!).”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2218326/posts?page=36#25

Atlaw, who behaves just like a slimy lawyer, ignores my reply above and pretends like I just admitted that I’m on the payroll for Harun Yahya!:

“Still pushing this little lie for Mr. Yahya, eh GGG? Well, I guess you don't want to piss off the guy who's paying your bills.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2218326/posts?page=36#31 I would also like to show how Mr. Lawyer deliberately takes my quotes out of context in order to smear me, and gain unfair advantage for his materialist, anti-creationist agenda. For instance Mr. Lawyer takes quotes from two different replies and fuses them together to make it look like I am saying something I am not. Here is how Mr. Lawyer quotes me:

“Actually, the majority of radical Islamist terrorists despise creation, and are materialist to the core. . . . All of them are hardcore Commie-Materialists who worship at the alter of evolutionary materialism . . .”

The first part is accurate. I truly believe that the majority of radical Islamist terrorists despise creation, are primarily politically motivated, and are materialist (and nihilist) to the core. However, Mr. Lawyer snatched the second part of the quote was from a TOTALLY DIFFERENT REPLY, and is trying to deliberately deceive the reader into believing that they both dealt with the same subject. In reality, the second part of the quote that Mr. Lawyer took out of context was in response to specific question directed at me from Mr. Lawyer:

“Please, name these mysterious, materialist, non-radically-religous and non-creationist Islamic radicals, GGG.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2218326/posts?page=36#33

My reply:

“All of them are hardcore Commie-Materialists who worship at the alter of evolutionary materialism”) was specifically referring to a list of Islamo-Commie terrorists and terrorist groups going all the way back to the Islamic Marxist movement that was started by the Bolsheviks in 1916. In that same reply, I spoke of the Commie-Terrorist roots of the PLO, how Bin Laden’s right hand man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, is a known KGB agent, and finally how a study found that the majority of Lebanese Hezbollah suicide bombers turned out to be secular Communists and socialists. I was referring to these specific terrorists when I said “All of them are hardcore Commie-Materialists who worship at the alter of evolutionary materialism.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2218326/posts?page=36#36

In the end, whether you agree with me or disagree with me, it is clear that Mr. Lawyer is willing to engage in slimy, dishonest, slanderous and disruptive behavior in the service of his agenda to discredit Christian creationists.

Re: atlaw's reply in #40

==Atlaw writes: "Let's compare your words to those of your Islamic-Creationist mentor, shall we?"