Link at the bottom:
This is not surprising either, given the fact that both the PLO and the Baathist movement were originally creations of the Soviet Unionthe PLO is a Soviet inspired Communist movement.
This is evidenced in the Charters frequent use of familiar terms like Imperialist and Imperialism which are KGB coined invectives for the United States, and others like Vanguard, and Progressive which are familiar Soviet terms applied to communists and communist movements.
But you need not decipher words in the charter to reach that conclusion. Former CIA Deputy Director Ray Cline provided ample proof in his book Terrorism, The Soviet Connection.[8]
And theres more. Ion Pacepa, acting chief of Romanian foreign intelligence, was the highest-ranking intelligence officer to ever defect from the Soviet Bloc. His group was tasked with training PLO leaders. In a recent interview with FrontPageMagazine.com, he stated:
The PLO was dreamt up by the KGB, which had a penchant for liberation organizations. In 1964 the first PLO council, consisting of 422 Palestinian representatives handpicked by the KGB, approved the Palestinian National Charter-a document that had been drafted in Moscow.[9]
The most damning evidence against Arafats claimed aspirations for Palestinian statehood however, is his own words. In his FrontPage interview, Pacepa describes an exchange Arafat had with late Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu in 1978. Ceausescu had just informed him that Moscow wanted him to pretend that the PLO was willing to renounce terrorism in hopes of becoming a Palestinian state. Breznev thought that then President Carter would buy it:
But we are a revolution, Arafat exploded...We were born as a revolution and we should remain an unfettered revolution. Arafat expostulated that the Palestinians lacked the tradition, unity and discipline to become a formal state [emph. mine]...and he was not willing to put any laws or other obstacles in the way of the Palestinian struggle to eradicate the state of Israel.[10]
But Ceausescu prevailed on Arafat:
Ceausescu...told [Arafat] that, if he would transform the PLO into a government-in-exile and would pretend to break with terrorism, the West would shower him with money and glory. But you have to keep on pretending, over and over...in the shadow of your government-in-exile you can keep as many terrorist groups as you want, as long as they are not publicly connected with your name.[11]
Arafat was granted the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994 for renouncing terrorism and promising to change the PLO charters goal of eliminating Israel. None of these promises have been kept, despite Arafats solemn oaths, made over and over as Ceausescu suggested.
On September 13, 1993, the same day Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin signed the Declaration of Principles embodying those ideals for which he would later get the Nobel Prize, he explained his motives on Lebanese TV:
Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel.[12]
As I mentioned earlier, a Palestinian state is not the PLOs goal, never has been. Once you accept this, it is easy to understand why he rebuffed former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Baraks extremely generous offer of statehood for Palestine.
Yasser Arafat was not a Moslem.
He was fully indoctrinated in the culture and ideology of radical communist revolutionaries and enjoyed the support and full backing of the Soviet Bloc. He was a Communist.
Pacepa flatly stated Arafat was a devoted Marxist-Leninist.[13] This is not really news, any movement dreamt up by the KGB would, by definition, have to be communist at its core. Arafats professed belief in Islam, right down to TV shots of him bowing on a prayer mat in traditional Moslem fashion, is pure political theater, nothing more. So Arafats al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, while professing allegiance to Allah, are simply stooges carrying out the terrorist policies of the atheistic PLO.
Link:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=20481815-E639-4201-A4FE-BE3C4F3C2A58
My suspicion is that they tend to express themselves in socialistic/Marxist terminology of class warfare and oppression to the western world (which is attuned to secular socialism), and in Islamic jihadist terminology to the Muslim world.