Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
"Instead, those obligations would be transferred to an "old GM," made up of less-desirable brands like Hummer and Saturn, and underperforming plants and other assets.

How would any of this be legal? Barry's plan is to divide the company into good and bad pieces. Presumably, the UAW gets an equity stake in the good piece, but the bond and stockholders get the big crap sandwich full of the bad piece.

To me (and I'm only an investor, not an attorney), it would seem this would be tied up in civil litigation for decades.

37 posted on 03/30/2009 1:27:15 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey

Legally, it is only feasible to do in bankruptcy court.

Otherwise, you’re right, it would be illegal, violating a bunch of bond covenants, shareholder approval requirement, collective bargaining agreements, and might well constitute a fraudulent conveyance to boot.


46 posted on 03/30/2009 1:45:25 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson