To: papasmurf
Ms. Mathis wrote, In response to your questions to our reporter, Stephanie Strom, we do not discuss our newsgathering and wont comment except to say that political considerations played no role in our decisions about how to cover this story or any other story about President Obama.The NYT says "political considerations played no role." That makes me feel a lot better.
83 posted on
03/31/2009 6:16:15 AM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
To: papasmurf
Ms. Mathis wrote, In response to your questions to our reporter, Stephanie Strom, we do not discuss our newsgathering and wont comment except to say that political considerations played no role in our decisions about how to cover this story or any other story about President Obama.Come to think of it, the editors probably didn't have to kill the story. Since they had already hired a bunch of left wing reporters who would not include anything that might hurt Obama, they wouldn't have to do anything.
84 posted on
03/31/2009 6:26:43 AM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Yeah, we’ll take their word for it, right? Not!
90 posted on
03/31/2009 9:15:02 AM PDT by
papasmurf
(Trow da' bum out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson