“Instead, you told me to read the whole thread again to find your source.”
Not quite
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:52:26 PM · 475 of 510
ansel12 to BykrBayb
Read the thread.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies
What are you talking about and why are you calling me a liar and why are you ignoring all the other outlets in post 496?
Quantcast is the only source for freerepublic’s numbers it was posted in 335, Jim had already brought it in before I wanted it to be posted.
We are all using Quantcast for the freerepublic numbers, I had that source long before Jim brought it in has “his” source.
You seemed to take Quantcast and started posting a lot of stuff from it.
Pesonally I used internetmarkets.net for my Drudge numbers and I have used other sources for everything else, except for freerepublic for which as I keep saying Quantcast is the only source.
“Jim gave the only source any of us have for freerepublic and a freeper posted the link he gave her, for some reason instead of labeling it Jim’s source you want to label it as mine, I only pointed out that I havent used that source for any of my postings about other conservative media like I referenced in post 496. I did have Jims source ready for when the moment arose, but he and the other freeper posted it first.
For everything except freerepublic I am using sources like intermarkets,editorsweblog,stateofthenews,and others.”
The bottom line is that you keep trying to find personal angles to everything rather than my original point, Fr is not a majority female site, that would fly in the face of common sense, that is what post 496 is about it helps to illustrate that point. My original point has been made and verified.
No, it hasn’t. The only thing your posts have proven is that you lie. If there’s anything else you’d like to prove, try using facts, and don’t get caught lying about your source.