So now you’re back to claiming you don’t have a source, after lying about the link that HollyB providing, and claiming that was your source.
Just an FYI, JimR questioned the accuracy of that site as well. But, that’s all he had to provide me with with I asked him what the ratio was of men/women on FR.
“So now you’re back to claiming you don’t have a source, after lying about the link that HollyB providing, and claiming that was your source.”
Why are you getting angry and personal, I am not in an argument with you or making radical posts or claims, all I am doing is pointing out readership demographics which is just every day industry statistics, it shouldn’t be drawing out any personal attacks, or strong emotional responses from you.
Jim gave the only source any of us have for freerepublic and a freeper posted the link he gave her, for some reason instead of labeling it Jims source you want to label it as mine, I only pointed out that I haven’t used that source for any of my postings about other conservative media like I referenced in post 496. I did have Jim’s source ready for when the moment arose, but he and the other freeper posted it first.
For everything except freerepublic I am using sources like intermarkets,editorsweblog,stateofthenews,and others.
The main point is that you can lighten up some, this is just run of the mill demographics stuff that the industry uses to know who their readers and customers are.