Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

My wife Mrs. OneVike, asked me when she read this,

"Why do you insist on messing with the hornet nets?".

I looked at her and said with a smile,

Because it's fun.

Well anyway, this should be fun.
1 posted on 03/29/2009 5:51:07 PM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: OneVike

I am a woman and I totally agree with you.

Take a look at what’s happened to news. Used to be men would get the facts, report what happened. Now that women dominate all we get are FEELINGS. I’m personally sick of seeing women quite so much. Watch old 50’s clips and it is amazing how few women are sounding off or are even in evidence - which really is refreshing.


43 posted on 03/29/2009 6:07:50 PM PDT by marychesnutfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

Yes. Women are natures socialists.


50 posted on 03/29/2009 6:10:32 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

Well, it is pretty clear that women vote socialist, ensuring the demise of their own society.


51 posted on 03/29/2009 6:10:38 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

When you boil it down, if it weren’t for that warm void in their nether regions, they’d be shooting them in the streets.


52 posted on 03/29/2009 6:11:44 PM PDT by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike
My wife agrees with this. She suggested it to me 20 years ago. She said most young women will vote for a husband and/or father to provide for them.That way eventually brings Stalin or at least Mussolini. Women will never be the rulers, except for individual electees, but they will select the rulers by their own lights because they always will be the majority, at least unless we institute a One-Child policy. Then, after a couple of generations, men will rule again because women as a group will always prefer sons to daughters- to protect and provide for them, of course.

The future of the world is probably with India and China, or with Islam. In China and India girl children in great numbers do not succeed in getting born. In Islamistan females are held to the status of cattle and goats and will never rule. And the wealthier men have multiple wives so that many men stay womanless and aggressive. These are masculine cultures whose focus must remain outward to conquest in order to keep the restless womanless men from storming the Capital. The West is all feminine cultures, ruled by women and are inwardly directed and must eventually succumb.

Making nice with the meanies on the block only gets your kid beat up.

55 posted on 03/29/2009 6:12:30 PM PDT by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

“Academics have long pondered why the government started growing precisely when it did. The federal government, aside from periods of wartime, consumed about 2 percent to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) up until World War I. It was the first war that the government spending didn’t go all the way back down to its pre-war levels, and then, in the 1920s, non-military federal spending began steadily climbing. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal — often viewed as the genesis of big government — really just continued an earlier trend. What changed before Roosevelt came to power that explains the growth of government? The answer is women’s suffrage.

For decades, polls have shown that women as a group vote differently than men. Without the women’s vote, Republicans would have swept every presidential race but one between 1968 and 2004.

The gender gap exists on various issues. The major one is the issue of smaller government and lower taxes, which is a much higher priority for men than for women. This is seen in divergent attitudes held by men and women on many separate issues. Women were much more opposed to the 1996 federal welfare reforms, which mandated time limits for receiving welfare and imposed some work requirements on welfare recipients. Women are also more supportive of Medicare, Social Security and educational expenditures.”

—John Lott, Women’s Suffrage over Time, http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/WashTimesWomensSuff112707.html


65 posted on 03/29/2009 6:17:12 PM PDT by flowerplough (52% of us with incomes over $200k voted for Obama and 60% of those earning under $30K did, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

Geez, they can’t even be taught to leave the toilet seat up, and we give them a right to vote?


69 posted on 03/29/2009 6:18:46 PM PDT by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

IMHO, it’s not women who got us into this mess. I think that only taxpayers should be allowed to vote. They’re the ones who have a stake in the outcome. The rest just vote for more ‘government benefits.’


82 posted on 03/29/2009 6:28:37 PM PDT by fellowpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

I’ll just wait to hear Oprah’s views on this topic.


83 posted on 03/29/2009 6:29:06 PM PDT by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

Women got the right to vote now? I missed that. Obama’s fault!


86 posted on 03/29/2009 6:30:21 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

At this point I would be happy to limit the vote to citizens who actually pay taxes.


87 posted on 03/29/2009 6:30:55 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

Women received the right to vote in 1920.

The great progressive era occurred after the election of 1912 when W. Wilson became president. We got the income tax,
the Federal Reserve System and so forth. All of those great things occurred before women could vote (Women could vote in some western states before 1920)


116 posted on 03/29/2009 6:49:13 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

This has sparked more than one debate in my
home....whichI usually win...= )


125 posted on 03/29/2009 6:58:48 PM PDT by StnCldTruth (A gun in your hand is better than a cop on the phone !!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike
I don't know why I chose the stupid route and decided to give my opinion on this subject but here goes.

I have had many great conversations with women about how some women view politics. Many tell me that one of the things that women are concerned about is being broke and on the street. Men don't think about that very much. They ( women ) want security and the democrats offer it in spades. I understand this. But with security you sometimes get a loss of freedoms. But hey, didn't Al and Tipper kiss good??

126 posted on 03/29/2009 6:59:12 PM PDT by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

HA! My son, 22, and I were talking about this very thing the other day. There are some points to be made ...


133 posted on 03/29/2009 7:04:58 PM PDT by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

ROFL...I wonder if Clinton or Obama would have been elected if women didn’t vote.

I am just saying...ROFL...fire away!!!

BTW my wife says the same thing but she would be pointing something at me at the same time...lol

This is destined to be a classic thread.


140 posted on 03/29/2009 7:13:27 PM PDT by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

If anyone thought women were soft, they need to look at this thread. The women here are tough.


141 posted on 03/29/2009 7:13:41 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

I believed this when AL Gore airbrushed a bigger penis on the cover of Rolling Stone and kissed (manhandled)his wife on TV....if women wern’t voting it would be more about the issues.


146 posted on 03/29/2009 7:15:25 PM PDT by bigjoesaddle ("Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play" -- Joseph Goebbels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike
I agree about the 19th Amendment. Because women have the vote, we get idiots like Bill Clinton who "feels your pain" and Stuttering Barack Oteleprompter the pretty-boy descendant of slaveowners and muslim slavetraders.

That said, I believe women should be allowed to run for office. A woman who can make it in a man's world (ie, Golda Meir, Maggie Thatcher, Sarah Palin, etc.) is worthy of getting a man's vote. Sounds hypocritical, but it's no worse than Albore jetting around the world preaching to us about our carbon footprint.

154 posted on 03/29/2009 7:25:15 PM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike

bookmark


155 posted on 03/29/2009 7:25:23 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson