Video Offered for Sale Purports to Show Biden's Daughter Snorting Cocaine

Fox News ^ | 3/28/2009

[Paige]

A video purporting to show Ashley Biden -- daughter of Vice President Joe Biden -- snorting cocaine reportedly is being offered for sale. The New York Post reports that it was shown a 90-second clip of a 42-minute video by a lawyer claiming to represent an anonymous "friend" of the vice president's daughter. The lawyer, Thomas Dunlap, and another man say the video shows Biden's daughter using the drug at a house party this month in Delaware.

[linn37]

Funny video but a bit on the long side.

[ChrisInAR]

I know but don’t care. Change the law.

[EQAndyBuzz]

There is a law. Drugs are illegal. Taking drugs are illegal. What part of illegal is so hard to grasp?

[Lawgvr1955]

Since when is a 27 year old a "child?"

Child as defined as progeny, offspring, next generation, etc.

As I am not a lib, child has a meaning other than "chilrun" in the Jocelyn Elders lexicon.

[ChrisInAR]

Just as expected, Hillary was wrong: it’s our nation’s insatiable Prohibitionist laws that are the reason for the violence. No more Drug War = no more crime.

[ChrisInAR]

None of it is hard to grasp. I just refuse to live by them.

[Lawgvr1955]

To: wombtotomb

1. Hillary Clinton is an idiot and Democrat true believers will never "connect the dots" about Ms. Biden's drug use.

2. You paint with too broad a brush. Many drug abusers were raised by saintly parents. Many of them good and true conservatives.

3. Lead on Don Quixote.

4. If she is a drug addict, report it to her bosses, don't sell the info to the media.

Lastly, as I said, my G.A.S. meter isn't pegged. (Give A Shart.)

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Right, declare the robbing of banks legal= No more crime.

So, how long have you been a member of DU?

Here at Free Republic, we actually respect the Rule of Law, because there are benefits to all of society, like a stable nonaddictive population.

[yazoo]

Who really cares? With all the damage Obama and Biden are going to do to this country, what Biden’s daughter does is not even worth mentioning.

[FreepShop1]

What about Biden’s son who defrauded investors for millions, along with Biden’s brother? This was well known for month before the election, yet still goes unreported by the media.

[mad_as_he$$]

lol. Winner!

[Red Dog #1]

If I may also add a reason #5...
It brings into question the judgment of Biden and possibly Obama concerning their choice of political associations and raises further concerns of nepotism/cronyism. BTW, if I remember correctly drug/dangerous driving troubles of one of the Gore children was swept under the rug.

[ChrisInAR]

Please, lay off the insults (by comparing me to DU). The laws that are written myst comply to the Supreme Law of the Land, which is the Constitution—& nowhere in the Constitution does it give the feds the power to criminalize drug use.

[kabar]

Why not just say 27 year old daughter? The Libs have seized the lexicon and you are just perpetuating it. Monica was described as a child as well in her tryst with BJ.

[Lawgvr1955]

The laws that are written myst comply to the Supreme Law of the Land, which is the Constitution—& nowhere in the Constitution does it give the feds the power to criminalize drug use.

The way the Supreme Court interprets the Commerce Clause, there is absolutely nothing the feds can't regulate. We are all small cogs in the large wheel.

Sad.

[kabar]

nowhere in the Constitution does it give the feds the power to criminalize drug use.

So what does the Constitution authorize the feds to criminalize? Provide some specifics.

[Lawgvr1955]

Why not just say 27 year old daughter? The Libs have seized the lexicon and you are just perpetuating it. Monica was described as a child as well in her tryst with BJ.

Sorry Mr. Webster. I will try to use the language decreed by the Speech Nazis.

[kabar]

LOL. No soup for you.

[ChrisInAR]

The Supreme Court has been just as guilty of re-interpreting the Constitution as Congress & the Presidents have been (take Roe v. Wade, for instance — making up new “rights” while squashing original rights). That’s doesn’t make it constitutional, however.

[ChrisInAR]

Read article I, Section 8....they are listed in detail right there.