Dan Rather, is that you? Using forged evidence to tarnish conservatives did not work too well last time around did it? Some fools will never learn.
In the mean time, as you accuse a fellow FReeper of lying and fabricating evidence, you're supporting a candidate whose supporters here on Free Republic frequently lie outright with false claims that Rush Limbaugh and Michael Reagan "endorsed" him, when there is ZERO, nada, zilch, null, big fat donut hole, evidence anywhere that they did. Desperate Romney supporters take weak and/or non-political praise by big names that was clearly never intended to be an "endorsement," and ... lie about it. Oh sure, they post carefully clipped and parsed quotes or transcripts entirely out of context to support their mistaken assumption that endorsement was intended, but a contextual reading of the parsed words proves wholly that neither M. Reagan nor Rush ever "endorsed" Romney in the honest, ethical sense of the word, and really not in any sense of the word at all! It's all wishful thinking on Romney supporters' side, and they turn those wishes in to LIES.
And you expect me to think it's any different with your accusation of forgeries?
So I guess the items I've linked to noting Romney's outreach to the gay community, including endorsing a "Gay Youth Pride" parade at a junior high school, for pity's sake, were all ... mean fabricated forgeries??
And after all these years, no Romney official has known about it, let alone attemped to set the record straight, shout to the world that these are forgeries, and come out aggressively hunting down those who would sink to such lows?
Romney is that wimpy at defending his honor? Give me a break. I think that the more likely reality is that there weren't any forgeries -- the items are genuine.