Oh, I see, you don’t know what became of the missing data either. Oh my. You don’t suppose the entire Evo science community could have fallen for a theory published by a non-scientist/med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist with no data to substantiate it do you?
And speaking of data. You seem to be quite confident there are data that support Darwood’s dataless theory of evolution. What data would that be exactly?
“and speaking of data. You seem to be quite confident there are data that support Darwood’s dataless theory of evolution. What data would that be exactly?”
I’m just here for the argument. It’s much cheaper than the full half-hour.