No kidding. For instance, here is Darwood's first published "tree of life." It comes from his book Origins. Now, I have been searching for the data behind those data points for years. And after all this time, wouldn't you know it, I can't find the data that substantiates Darwood's "tree of life" anywhere. It's nowhere to be found in his long argument...err...I mean science book. Peraps the data just got misplaced? Perhaps the original data is kept in a super-secret compartment deep within the bowels of the Temple of Darwin! Please help me find the missing data, RFE. After all, Darwood was a great scientist, so he wouldn't publish his Godless theory without data, now would he???
“Please help me find the missing data, RFE. After all, Darwood was a great scientist, so he wouldn’t publish his Godless theory without data, now would he???”
So now I finally get it: You try to refute evolution without data because you think that the theory of evolution has no data.
I’ve got no specific opinion on Darwin himself. Just his theories are of interest, which have been revised and extended since then - as you have, no doubt noticed.