To: Sergeant Tim
"I understand the decision from a marketing point of view. But it saddens me that it's no longer economically viable to declare who we are." I don't understand it.
Freedom isn't marketable??? Are there too many potential customers out there saying, "Freedom? Oh no. None for me, thanks."
9 posted on
03/27/2009 7:05:04 AM PDT by
TChris
(There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
To: TChris
I don't see any value in having things
named "Freedom" in a country where there is less freedom every day. It's a little too Ingsoc for me.
For example, if the building was named "Hugo Chavez Tower" and I could take my Leatherman on an airline flight, on balance I'd call that a plus.
13 posted on
03/27/2009 7:09:21 AM PDT by
Notary Sojac
(Chains you can believe in...)
To: TChris
Are there too many potential customers out there saying, "Freedom? Oh no. None for me, thanks." Well, for one, the Chinese are offended. And probably the North Koreans - and definitely the Iranians...
110 posted on
03/27/2009 11:40:22 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(With-it liberals are moving on to the next hoax: WATER!We're all going to die of thirst.)
To: TChris
Are there too many potential customers out there saying, "Freedom? Oh no. None for me, thanks." 52% of the people who voted.
144 posted on
03/28/2009 5:33:38 AM PDT by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson