Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoII

said he had no plans to sue.

Probably because they’ll hire him back after the public attention has shifted.


8 posted on 03/27/2009 6:09:19 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DManA
said he had no plans to sue.

Probably because they’ll hire him back after the public attention has shifted.

From the article:

Murray, who had worked at the hotel for 25 years, also said he had no plans to sue.

It was the bell captain who said he had no plans to sue, not the fired manager. I think that it was awesome that one of the top dogs of the company flew out to terminate the manager himself!

Mark

13 posted on 03/27/2009 6:18:09 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

It was the bell-boy who was slandered who stated that he had no plans to sue, not the idiot manager who was fired.


14 posted on 03/27/2009 6:22:34 AM PDT by motoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

He wasn’t fired.

His boss was.


15 posted on 03/27/2009 6:23:50 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

no, the bellman who as offended has no plans to sue. He was not fired.


32 posted on 03/27/2009 8:33:21 AM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson