Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
There will be no nuclear warfare but a short, swift war that could have menacing consequences for India

Then why has India nukes? (Another) Chinese attack ought to be deterred. Would China risk losing major cities for attacking India?

Don't see that.

2 posted on 03/26/2009 6:27:16 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "We do not want to becomes slaves of Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SolidWood

Some would argue that there is ‘space’ for a short conventional war, although as you say,it’s unlikely.

This is an article on the Indian military’s doctrine for a quick war with Pakistan before the nukes and Washington and the UN come in to the picture-

A Cold Start for
Hot Wars?
Walter C. Ladwig III
The Indian Army’s New Limited
War Doctrine

http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3203_pp158-190.pdf


4 posted on 03/26/2009 6:34:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SolidWood
I don't know much about the region or India's Nuclear Program. I do know that all responsible countries such as the United States, Old Soviet Union and even the Chi-Coms don't want to be the first one to use their nuclear arsenal.

I assume this applies to India as well.

6 posted on 03/26/2009 6:36:54 AM PDT by wmileo (I miss Ronald Wilson Reagan. POTUS #40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson