Replies

Would you have been in favor of the 21st Amendment?

I' ll bite.

First as an conservative I would have been against Prohibition as an states rights proponent.

2)Alcohol, unlike cocaine was/is and will be a part of America's(and Western Europe) cultural legacy and is firmly ingrained in our society. America would not have come into existence if it were not for the rum trade. It would be as if Peru, who has a history of chewing coca leaves, outlawed the usage of it's historical and cultural medicinal plant(not cocaine).
.

3)Alcohol can be made by the simplest of methods. All is needed is yeast, a source of sugar and time to ferment. It is made in even the most restrictive, monitored locations anywhere, our nation's prisons. Even the most uneducated of our nation's people, Appalachians could and did distill high grain alcohol(moonshine) and sent it into our largest cities. Prohibition could never be fought realistically because of these facts.

4)The Cocaine trade can be restricted effectively. There is no cocaine equivalent to bathtub gin. Cocaine must be grown in tropical regions, has to be processed using large amounts of dangerous chemicals and has to be smuggled into this country at tremendous risks and costs.

5)Alcohol and cocaine are entirely different birds. It takes years of usage to became addicted to alcohol. Not so cocaine. Cocaine usage is very addictive, in the end stage makes users paranoid, and causes tremendous costs to the user, their families and society at large.

As an states rights supporter, if any state was willing to legalize coke, as an experiment, I would not be against that. Though I believe it would be very destructive.