Got that right. And I thank Jim for keeping you around. You make a nice target.
>>>>>instead of just arguing and stating your point
I made my case in my very first post to you, troll. I pointed out that Willard opposed the two most successful conservative policy endeavors of the last 30 years --- Reaganism and the Contract With America. I think that speaks for itself. This forum doesn't exist to debate liberalism or the liberal legacy of Myth Romney either, Ms.Liberal.
Oh. Now I am a liberal troll.
You said
Got that right. And I thank Jim for keeping you around. You make a nice target.
Jim if this is true what ReaganMan has said then please do me a favor and support a zot against me now and also suspend my account. I know it is not true and my posts accentuate and prove in a variety of arenas that this is not true.
Now is the time to end such false accusations. If I am zotted and suspended ReaganMan then you are right. Otherwise drop the personal attacks and name calling against me.
ReaganMan you did make good points there and if true I am with you. You should have stuck to such points and left the personal attacks and insults out of it. It sort of piled on them and lost anything gained by your good points. I still wonder how and who appointed you (ReaganMan) as the police around here.
Jim. Where is ReaganMan's special FR badge or FR star for being somehow more authoritative and special--as he certainly thinks he has one.
As you know, I have no use for the guy, and if he runs again, which seems likely, he won't be getting my support. But to think you can't be conservative and support the guy is simply not true.
BTW, Hunter/Pence 2012.