From the looks of your posts, someone needs to straighten you out. Running around the forum whining and crying about how Romney and his supporters are being treated so badly, is SOP for you WillardBots. Besides, what do you expect? FR didn't support your precious Willard in the last election cycle and I don't see 2012 being any different should he choose to run again.
Legitimate debate on this forum doesn't include promoting unprincipled, two-faced politicos like Myth Romney.
Btw, Romney doesn't do anything unless he believes its in his best interest.
I may think you too need straightening out, but I do realize I can only best argue my point as I did regarded gamesmanship and intelligent dialog. I believe I made some thoughtful, thought provoking points too as I did so :-).
You have not done as such regarding my 'needing straightening out." Do I look physically unstraight to you? Are my posts physically unstraight. This may be a computer problem. LOL.
There was quite a lot of conjecture in your return post and certain amount that leads me to think you believe you have psychic abilities--LOL.
However you did make a claim and I would like for you to a at least back it up as I did my one small comments that threw a group ( a small one at that) into a tizzy.
First the moderators did not take the Mitt thread off the forum. Thus I assume Mitt Romney is a legitimate figure in which to debate as are comments about things he has said as well as posters like me offhandedly repeating something positive I learned about the man. None of those comments were removed for not being legitimate.
Can you attempt at least one post in which you do not call me a name or people who post an article, regarding Mitt Romney's comments on something, a name? It would go further at actually taking your arguments, if they are made, seriously.
So since you backed up another comment with a claim I want to follow this up. You said:
Btw, Romney doesn't do anything unless he believes its in his best interest.
How does contributing money and a large amount of time toward fighting for Norm Coleman and against Al Franken behind the scenes fulfill your claim? Even if you have an argument for such, who among us frequently gives time and money to things that are NOT in our best interest? Even when one gives to charity we do it in that we feel this is good and right for ourselves and fulfills on our commitment to let's say, God.
Is it a bad thing to do things that are in our best interest now along with it being bad to be ambitious and bad to make a lot of money and bad to be a success? I did not get the memo.