>>>>>I think you are becoming delusional.
Think again, but don't hurt yourself.
Fact: you're out of relevant ammunition. Now you're spinning yourself silly, grasping for anything that pops into your airhead. Replaying the same BS, over and over. Btw, what you see as funny, in reality is nothing more then you having a juvenile fantasy.
I see you've finally posted a response to the question I've been asking you since April.10th, 2009. So, even though you dragged them into this debate, in reality, "24", "Hobbit hole" and "South Park" ARE NOT important issues for this conservative political forum. Gotcha. And according to you, they're not even issues. Bad habits die hard for you.
Not satisfied with that hollow response, you once again have dragged a debate from one thread to another thread and once again are begging others to fight your battles for you. A clear sign, if there ever was one, you've lost the debate. You remind me of the old harpies on FR. They'd always needed to beg for help too. Pinging the harpy brigade was their clarion call. CharlesWayneCT is FR's new chief harpy.
>>>>>I have never defended the drug smuggler.
LMAO
You actually brought them into this "debate".Comment #235:Seems the biggest issue for you to discuss on this forum is the TV show, "24", starring that ultra-liberal and talentless actor, Keifer Sutherland.
I see you've finally posted a response to the question I've been asking you since April.10th, 2009.
This grows tiresome, I could make a full-time job correcting your errors, but you first asked me a QUESTION about 24 was on April 13th: COmment 240:Still waiting for you to tell me why you think "24", "Hobbit hole" and "South Park" are such important issues for this conservative forum.
I thought you'd appreciate me quoting other people, since you put such importance in it before. And of course, if mention other freepers, I ping them. You are still, I see, attacking what other freepers do on FR without pinging any of them to defend themselves. Probably a lot easier for you that way.