Replies

I did not whine to management. You posted Jim's comment as did another first. I merely asked that they one ping him if he is to be included and two asked if they have a point of view to articulate it themselves.

Heck I am doing the conservative movement a favor. If we can't articulate our point of view intelligently we don't have a chance. I am merely asking these people to be good conservatives and learn to fight (and with principled dialog as you can't convince others when you are treating them like dog do-do)

Still name calling I see.

Positive opinions in small does in which you do not agree should be seen for you as an opportunity to intelligently argue your point. If you believe he is so bad then for God's sake, remember this site is perused by millions and use intelligent disagreement. When you act like a parrot and a jerk, people do not take you seriously. Are you just preaching to the converted? Too bad as we are also having to preach outside our 'church' to win future elections and to clarify and articulate conservative values and solutions.

People other than fellow FReepers read these threads. Do you want to make a difference of not? If you want to convince GOP people to not vote for RINOs then make your argument. Jim has created a truth file to back up his stand. In the least you could have just simply made an intelligent point and provided the link to the truth file and moved on. Otherwise this thread is clogged up with all this ancillary stuff and helps no one.

There is a time to play offense on selling our values and time to play defense on selling our values. Right now to me is an offensive time and we need the tools in which to do this effectively. You need to brush up a bit in my opinion or will you just selfishly go on attacking others and chasing people away?

And if Jim wants to keep you around for fun, I'm all for it.

I do not claim to know Jim's mind or his motivations. I asked him squarely to support a zot against me and suspend me if he saw me as a liberal troll and all the etcs you have called me. He did not. His action states for itself that he does not agree with your assessment.

(Note to readers: Please excuse the redundancy I have clarified incorrect previous version in which I mistakenly italicized my own comment.)