Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

In my way of thinking the first amendment means one should be able to publish anything he wants anytime he wants.


6 posted on 03/25/2009 8:01:01 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ontap

However, liberals wouldn’t object to a video of George Bush having sex with sheep.


10 posted on 03/25/2009 8:04:19 AM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ontap
In my way of thinking the first amendment means one should be able to publish anything he wants anytime he wants.

Seems pretty clear-cut, but leave it to Souter and Ginzberg and company to come up with mind-boggling logic-defying language-twisting interpretations of the 1ST Amendment as to why this film should be censored.

11 posted on 03/25/2009 8:05:39 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ontap

Nope case law already has limitations on the first amendment. Nice to know you are an absolutist but the jusitices never have been


17 posted on 03/25/2009 9:01:49 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson