Thanks for the case. It appears Feilbogan was DeSantis's senior. Comparison as a whole is irrelevant. What is relevant is that in the Feilbogen case, AIG itself was perfectly content to break the contract. Evidence that the contract existed and was for a specific amount was contained in Gentile's spreadsheet, whose 2 entries were according to Finnegan's direction.
All you've done is assume a conclusion, which was the very point of disagreement in the Feilbogen litigation (presence of a contract), in order to assert that the Feilbogen and DeSantis contracts are comparable, in that AIG should be equally willing to abrogate both; or that AIG is inconsistent in acknowledging the existence and legitimacy of DeSantis contract while fighting the Feilbogen contract.
-- It appears Feilbogen was DeSantis's senior. --
I've seen you draw an attachment between Feilbogen and DeSantis in earlier posts. I haven't seen any supporting evidence of a business/working relationship between the two men.