[Moonman62]

In this model, there is no way to know this divine being or connect with him in a meaningful way. D’Espagnat’s notion of the impersonal/unknowable aspect of this god is not actually predicted by the model, but simply represents his own opinion on the matter.

Just his opinion and no predictions. He's worse than the evolutionists, but not worse than the religious fundamentalists.

[D-fendr]

From what little I can tell from the article, the prize is for “predicting.”

It reads to me like the scientific part is a restatement of Bell’s Theorem/EPR Paradox.