Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fanfan

Please see my post #33.

That is exactly why those folks moved their server off shore.

Therefore, I don’t understand the problem.

Either the Canadian government is bluffing, or they don’t know what they are doing.

I don’t know why the move to hire lawyers when Panamanian law makes it illegal to divulge offshore hosting information.


40 posted on 03/24/2009 9:24:07 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer); PapaBear3625

See PapaBear3625’s post # 39.

Maybe that’s it.

Connie and Mark live here.


43 posted on 03/24/2009 9:36:03 AM PDT by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

It’s not federal, “The Canadian government”, It’s the Ontario provincial liberal court, and players within the Ontario liberal government.

Freee Dominions case would probably be thrown out of the higher, federal court based on the Canadian Human Rights commissions findings alone.

As far as where Free Dominion is being hosted, it shows as a “.com /pa” so I would agree that the provincial court is either bluffing, or stupid.

That doesn’t relieve Free dominion site owners from having to argue it in court however, the sites owners are Canadian and live in Ontario I believe. That may tangle the issue if there aren’t any similar case laws that make Free Dominion outside of Ontario’s courts reach.


45 posted on 03/24/2009 9:48:22 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson