Bull feces. Non of those affect eligibility, the only criteria for which are: 35 or older, 14 years a resident of the United States, and a natural born citizen. Not even in the original Constitution did the person even need to be male, even though females could not vote. (Now wouldn't that have been "interesting"? :) )
>> Bull feces. Non of those affect eligibility, the only criteria for which are: 35 or older, 14 years a resident of the United States, and a natural born citizen.
Liberal justices have never before been limited by the text of the Constitution — why would you assume that they would abide by those limitations in this case? They will find a way to insert an ideological test for eligibility for the Presidency (just as Senators have done for Supreme Court confirmations). The Constitution, after all, is a “living document”.
And, even if the Justices of the Court do not agree — this will not prevent ACLU attorneys from ramming case after case through the court system (perhaps the 9th Circuit) in an effort to use the judicial removal power against any conservative that takes office.
Mark my words, if we allow the Court the authority to remove a sitting President — that power will be used against us.
SnakeDoc