Get your facts straight. The charges of the coverup weren't "bogus"--it was an issue of the initial investigation into the scene--where spent shells were picked up and the shooting not reported--not being an official proceding--NOT that the events didn't happen.
The twisting of facts by supposed "defenders" of people who may have made poor decisions does them no favors.
You have got to be kidding me! You weren't on the early threads where Johnny Sutton's lackeys claimed that R&C were "out to shoot Mexicans" and that Sutton had proof of such. Talk about Bogus!
There has been thread upon thread on FR for the last 2 years, along with transcripts, excerpts, and analysis -- all of which I participated in. I never saw you on a single one of those. So before you go lecturing me about "facts," please go read some of those threads and make comments there on anything you disagree with.