[cripplecreek]

Which proves they didn’t shoot an unarmed man. :-)

It proves that sutton didn't have the manhood to put all the evidence before the jury.

[CharlesWayneCT]

You do know that Sutton was not the prosecuter, and that the judge ruled the information should be withheld from the jury.

You do know that criminal law explicitly denies the jury “all the evidence”.

You do know that if evidence was improperly withheld from a jury, the Supreme court WOULD take the case and WOULD overturn the verdict.