[Cedric]

“(Archaeopteryx) the oldest-known fossil animal that is generally accepted as a bird.”

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/32599/Archaeopteryx

Not transitional.

[Ira_Louvin]

This is from your own link: Archaeopteryx shared many anatomic characters with coelurosaurs, a group of theropods (carnivorous dinosaurs). In fact, only the identification of feathers on the first known specimens indicated that the animal was a bird . Unlike living birds, however, Archaeopteryx had well-developed teeth and a long well-developed tail similar to those of smaller dinosaurs, except that it had a row of feathers on each side. The three fingers bore claws and moved independently, unlike the fused fingers of living birds. Archaeopteryx had well-developed wings, and the structure and arrangement of its wing feathers—similar to that of most living birds—indicate that it could fly. Skeletal structures related to flight are incompletely developed, however, which suggests that Archaeopteryx may not have been able to sustain flight for great distances. Archaeopteryx is known to have evolved from small carnivorous dinosaurs, as it retains many features such as teeth and a long tail. It also retains a wishbone, a breastbone, hollow, thin-walled bones, air sacs in the backbones, and feathers, which are also found in the nonavian coelurosaurian relatives of birds. These structures, therefore, cannot be said to have evolved for the purpose of flight, because they were already present in dinosaurs before either birds or flight evolved. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/32599/Archaeopteryx

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

Not transitional.

Thought experiment for you: if birds did evolve from dinosaurs, what would a transitional look like?