Your legalistic comment at #58 says, " Yet AGAIN: SHOW ME THE VERSE THAT SAYS HE DRANK WINE. At the Last Supper it was “fruit of the vine” (grape juice) that He served to the apostles. IT DOES NOT SAY HE DRANK IT. He served it to THEM." is an example of legalism.
You say Jesus didn't even drink the fruit of the vine, because it doesn't say that he did!
So I say to you in Matthew 26, where the entirety of the Passover is discussed and no mention is made of Jesus praying, your logic then must follow that He didn't pray, not that he did pray.
But this hasn't been the case. You have become confused.
According to you if the scripture doesn't mention that He drank, He didn't drink.
Therefore, if the scripture doesn't mention that He didn't pray, He didn't pray.
You cannot have it both ways.
Your logic is faulty, and you are having difficulty keeping track of the arguments.
As such, discussing the point further holds no purpose, because your hardened heart and inability to follow the discussion because you have confused you and damaged your argument.
What I want to know is, if it was GRAPE JUICE, where did they get the SUGAR?