To: mountainlion
22 posted on
03/22/2009 8:27:39 AM PDT by
Polybius
To: Polybius
My bias is to assume the man innocent. I have seen much in the media that was completely false and of course there is the LIAR john kerry to take into consideration. murtha lied about cold blooded murder like kerry.
44 posted on
03/22/2009 10:03:16 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: Polybius
Apparently the forensics expert is saying that the prosecution’s description of the incident (which you posted) is backwards. That instead of being shot “in the head and chest,” the shooting was done in first in the chest, and then in the head. And that this order of shooting can only be explained by self-defense.
45 posted on
03/22/2009 10:22:42 AM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: Polybius
That has described murder, not combat.
History says that the ancient Celts fought naked in combat. This man was not an ancient Celt.
I would assume if the Iraqi was indeed naked, it was an intimidation tactic for an improvised interrogation by the Lt. The prosecutors' own forensic expert tried to tell the prosecutors that he found the defense experts explanation the only one that made sense. He even did a demonstration test to prove his theory. He was dismissed without giving testimony that would have been favorable to the defense.
The military must maintain order to remain effective. Not abiding murder is one aspect of good order. Following the rule of law in the courtroom is another aspect. Behenna was not convicted of premeditated murder. He was also not given the benefit of evidence that backed up his self-defense claim.......
........regardless of whether the Iraqi was naked or not. A naked man can still be a threat.
52 posted on
03/22/2009 11:05:53 AM PDT by
Girlene
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson