Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vaccine could protect against virus that causes birth defects
Science News ^ | March 18th, 2009 | Nathan Seppa

Posted on 03/21/2009 3:58:33 PM PDT by neverdem

Shots might prevent some birth defects caused by cytomegalovirus infections in moms-to-be

An experimental vaccine is effective half the time in stopping cytomegalovirus infection in women in their child-bearing years, researchers report in the March 19 New England Journal of Medicine.

No vaccine currently exists for cytomegalovirus, which can cause birth defects when it infects a pregnant woman. Because of this risk, vaccine researchers have targeted the virus for decades — without any clear benefit until now.

“This is the first vaccine that really shows prevention from infection with cytomegalovirus,” says Walla Dempsey, a microbiologist and immunologist at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Md., who wasn’t a researcher on this study.

Most people get infected by cytomegalovirus as children and have few complications or even symptoms. Nearly two-thirds of women in child-bearing years have already been infected with cytomegalovirus.

But roughly 27,000 first-time cytomegalovirus infections occur in pregnant women in the United States every year. These women don’t harbor home-grown antibodies — generated from a previous infection — that would lower the risk of re-infection, says Robert Pass, an infectious disease pediatrician at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who coauthored the new study. As a result, such women have a one-in-three chance of passing the virus along to their fetuses via the placenta. At birth, infected babies have an 11 percent chance of having symptoms that include hearing damage, visual impairment, mental retardation and diminished motor skills.

From 1999 to 2006, Pass and his colleagues recruited 464 women in their childbearing years who had tested negative for cytomegalovirus antibodies.

Half the volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine in three shots spaced over six months. The other half got placebo shots over a similar time span. The researchers attempted to follow each participant...

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: cmv; cmvvaccine; cytomegalovirus; vaccine
Vaccine Prevention of Maternal Cytomegalovirus Infection
1 posted on 03/21/2009 3:58:33 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe; null and void; ...

micro ping


2 posted on 03/21/2009 4:00:21 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But.. didn't we just have a couple of threads yesterday about
how having retarded children is the mostest-bestest-blessing ever?
3 posted on 03/21/2009 4:00:22 PM PDT by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

For years as a blood donor, I showed as CMV negative, in a rare blood type. No wonder I got so many calls to donate.


4 posted on 03/21/2009 4:04:57 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Real classy your comment...


5 posted on 03/21/2009 4:08:06 PM PDT by Fichori (The only bailout I'm interested in is the one where the entire Democrat party leaves the county)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

What’s your blood type, if I may ask?


6 posted on 03/21/2009 4:19:17 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“What’s your blood type, if I may ask?”

that’s ok, I’m waiting for the “all vaccines are evil” crowd.


7 posted on 03/21/2009 4:23:48 PM PDT by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

O neg., abt. 6% of the Pop.

CMV Neg. is a subset of that.


8 posted on 03/21/2009 11:57:26 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
At one time, type O negative blood was considered the universal blood donor type. This implied that anyone — regardless of blood type — could receive type O negative blood without risking a transfusion reaction. However, even type O negative blood may have antibodies that cause serious reactions during a transfusion.

Ideally, blood transfusions are done with donated blood that's an exact match for type and Rh factor. Even then, small samples of the recipient's and donor's blood are mixed to check compatibility in a process known as crossmatching. In an emergency, however, type O negative red blood cells may be given to anyone — especially if the situation is life-threatening or the matching blood type is in short supply.

Thanks for your answer!

9 posted on 03/22/2009 12:37:04 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson