You assume. Or it could have been "You should be shot on sight!"
So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?
So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?
I did not assume anything.
All the article saysd is, "He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report."
If it were a simple threat of violence the paper would have printed it. It sounds like he said something vulgar.
I don't rule out anything nor do I assume anything.