Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58
He told him to go f himself? maybe something worse, it isn't stated. I still don't see a threat of violence.

You assume. Or it could have been "You should be shot on sight!"

So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?

29 posted on 03/21/2009 5:12:59 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: kinsman redeemer
You assume. Or it could have been "You should be shot on sight!"

So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?

I did not assume anything.

All the article saysd is, "He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report."

If it were a simple threat of violence the paper would have printed it. It sounds like he said something vulgar.

I don't rule out anything nor do I assume anything.

30 posted on 03/21/2009 6:02:35 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: kinsman redeemer
Threats of violence against a federal judge is a felony, I'm inclined to think there were no such threats or he would have received more than a "visit" from U.S. Marshals.
32 posted on 03/21/2009 6:16:11 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson