"Timing" does seem to trump time in essence..
In that sense time does not exist but timing does..
The timing of the moment.. is reality..
Oddly, I conceptualize "time" in exactly the reverse order than that given in your above description, dear brother in Christ. I.e., I take your description to propose: (1) reality first; (2) as produced by timing in irreversible flow; and (3) then, in last place, along hobbles the very idea of "time" as somehow the product of reality and "timing."
It seems to me "timing" only seems to trump "time in essence" [in your meaning: eternity??? timelessness???] because human beings are so tied to their physical experience that they cannot see that neither "time" nor "timing" is ultimately physical. Phenomenal, for sure; but physical not.
That is not to say that time cannot be measured. The measurable aspect of time is necessarily an indispensable part of any scientific investigation of reality. And yet even the scientists especially the physicists nowadays have been heard to complain that presently-constituted human notions of "time" may be wholly inadequate to the full explication of reality.
How can there be a notion of "timing" without reference to a more fundamental notion of "time" itself? "Timing" would seem to imply the prior existence of a criterion that is not itself subject to "timing."
Just some more maunderings, stray thoughts....
Thank you ever so much for writing, dear brother in Christ!