[Dog Gone]

This is progress. You don't assert that Darwin stopped science in its tracks as WonderousCreation does. And you're willing to concede that your opposition to evolution is based on your interpretation of the Bible.

That is refreshingly honest, and it leaves open questioning your interpretation of the Bible as much it permits you to question science.

[GodGunsGuts]

Actually, I do believe that Darwinism is a science stopper. Thankfully, the vast majority of scientists ignore Darwin and tacitly proceed as though nature has design and purpose. This really bugs Richard Dawkins et al, because scientists are forced to use the language of design to explain living organisms. Indeed, he is currently trying to find a way to banish the language of design from the natural sciences. Unfortunately for Dawkins, the new language he has come up with implies purpose! Poor chap.