Well, sometimes these debates can be fun.
However, I reject the radical darwinists and the radical creationists as both sides have much that they can not explain -—
Which, I believe, is EXACTLY what God intended.
Humility is the proper course here.
We don't know.
To me, the “Tree of Knowledge” represented the fact that Adam and Eve did not remain humble, and tried to be like God.
There are those on both sides of this debate, IMHO, who should be careful NOT to follow the example of Adam and Eve.
Admit what we don't know and move on.
Well put.
Well, sometimes these debates can be fun.
However, I reject the radical darwinists and the radical creationists as both sides have much that they can not explain -—
Which, I believe, is EXACTLY what God intended.
Humility is the proper course here.
We don’t know.
To me, the “Tree of Knowledge” represented the fact that Adam and Eve did not remain humble, and tried to be like God.
There are those on both sides of this debate, IMHO, who should be careful NOT to follow the example of Adam and Eve.
Admit what we don’t know and move on.
The one thing I keep noticing is meanwhile one side pretends to be gracious in admitting they don’t have all the answers, and even though they admit it, they get really fearful that someone else might, to the point they have to sue the other side into silence when threatened.
Hard to move on with all that kind of insecurity going on!