Thanks. In a strange way, an unemployment rate of 10% this year might be a good thing, if you know what I mean.
I wonder which traitor RINOs we will get on the next amnesty. Could Obama antagonize McCain and Graham so much on other issues that they would oppose him on amnesty? Probably not. McCain will probably be one of the amnesty leaders, no matter how obnoxious Obama is on other issues.
In a strange way, an unemployment rate of 10% this year might be a good thing, if you know what I mean.
Yes, I do know what you mean, though I would rather not wish this mess on anyone. It would be far better if our politicians (on BOTH sides of the aisle), and our traders, had some sense of honor and loyalty to their own.
I wonder which traitor RINOs we will get on the next amnesty. Could Obama antagonize McCain and Graham so much on other issues that they would oppose him on amnesty?
I am quite inclined to be in agreement with you, although it is likely that Graham will lead the RINO herd, and McCain't will be more subdued. Especially if we are getting into the campaign season- Remember, McCain't is up for election, and is liable to have a challenger on the right with national bias running strongly against him... He will be putting on his "conservative" hat a little early, I'll bet.
My hopes lie with the House anyway. The Blue Dogs are already chaffing from the liberal authoritarian leadership, and I fully expect them to rebel (no pun intended). They will eventually join with the Conservative Republicans (100 strong), as they always wind up doing. Let's hope it happens soon. And the Union states, particularly the Rust Belt, will be hard pressed to agree with Amnesty. I think the House is where the success or failure will lie.
The Senate is a grim picture. I do not think the Republicans can hold off an amnesty vote there. Too many willing accomplices on the right side of the aisle, and too many deal makers generally. Senators really should go back to being appointed by the states. What a bunch of whores.