Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

New targets of the Obama administration: Mark Haines and Erin Burnett
1 posted on 03/19/2009 3:24:12 PM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rufus2007
"New targets of the Obama administration: Mark Haines and Erin Burnett

I wish I would've seen this. Here's the best part, Erin Burnett is a screaming leftist Democrat. Remember, she's the one who described Bush as "chimp like". And, when Cramer was bashing Obama a few weeks ago on the Today show, Burnett was there and you could tell she was displeased with Cramer's position.

2 posted on 03/19/2009 3:26:16 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

I’m surprised Rangel didn’t say, “Why don’t you mind your g*&d*#@ business,” like he did to the guy from Hotair.com.


3 posted on 03/19/2009 3:29:54 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

4 posted on 03/19/2009 3:30:55 PM PDT by frogjerk (NO TAXATION FOR REAMORTIZATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

Congressman Charles Rangel should be removed from his position, immediately.


5 posted on 03/19/2009 3:31:39 PM PDT by this is my country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007
"When you violate the public trust, different rules apply - the same thing we have in charitable organizations, 501(c)3 when they have excessive payment in certain areas that we're able to penalize them for," Rangel said.

Did he actually say "able to penalize" rather than "have to penalize"? Is this a Freudian slip?

6 posted on 03/19/2009 3:32:57 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

If CNBC’s not veeeery careful dems will start treating them like they’re Republicans. And that ain’t pretty.


13 posted on 03/19/2009 3:40:46 PM PDT by GOPJ (CEO:Chief Embezzlement Officer- CFO:Corporate Fraud Officer-CASH FLOW: money down the toilet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007
So why exactly did Tom Delay have to temporarily step aside when there was a bogus ethics investigation underway, but Charlie Rangel doesn't?
21 posted on 03/19/2009 3:59:45 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

Rangel said. “I am telling you that you have to have some confidence in the House Ethics Committee, where we have Republicans and Democrats.”

Isn’t the “ House Ethics Committee” made up of politicians?


23 posted on 03/19/2009 4:16:09 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

Rangel is a great representative . . . of everything wrong with the system.


24 posted on 03/19/2009 4:19:16 PM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rufus2007

bfl


26 posted on 03/19/2009 4:45:04 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson