Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilDragoo; potlatch; devolve

J’Accuse ping.
The truth used to be an absolute defense.


254 posted on 03/19/2009 10:10:54 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: All
This from the website
http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa040398.htm

Every year, the Secret Service investigates over 1,500 reported or discovered threats against the President. While most people who threaten the President are just venting, even joking, all reported threats are taken very seriously and those who make them are in for, at least, a tough time.

What Constitutes a "Threat?"

According to this law -- 18 USC Sec. 871 -- which reads, in part:

"...Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
Threat or Criticism

Where is the line drawn? When does a critical remark become a threat? On one extreme is the off-hand comment, the letter to a friend, the email to a co-worker, or message posted in a newsgroup. On the other, the twisted psychotic plot. Clearly, the circumstances of delivery make a great deal of difference. A "letter to the editor", or speech intelligently attacking the President's every action and policy is our right and should never be construed as a physical threat. Screaming obscenities in the President's face, sending threatening mail to the White House, or publicly stating a desire to see the President harmed are not only acts of shameful disrespect, they should always be considered threats under the law.

255 posted on 03/19/2009 11:00:00 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; devolve

Thanks
Lol, I pinged both of you at post #206

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2210202/posts?page=206#206


326 posted on 03/20/2009 3:25:38 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson