Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DieHard the Hunter
Once this is precedent, what is to stop them from using this new found "bonus tax" to tax all businesses that contract with the Federal government?

This is the scariest proposal I have heard from this administration yet. This is the slippery slope that will come back to bite each and every one of us in the future!

For instance, the company I work for is a private company that gets approximately 60% of its work via government contracts. I also get both longevity bonuses, and quality bonuses. They are minimal amounts (less than $1,000.00 a year) but I work hard for those. What if eventually the Obama team decides he hasn't taxed bonuses enough, and all bonuses should be included? That way he can keep his promise of not taxing incomes of the "bottom" 95%.

Please be careful what you wish for, it could well come true.

9 posted on 03/19/2009 4:14:08 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: codercpc

I guess this is yet one more reason why the bailout is a bad idea, ay. No matter what happens, if bonuses are paid the alternatives are bad: either they get yanked back and bad legal precedent is set, or they get paid and bad remuneration precedent is set.

The Devil and the Deep Blue Sea. Perfect. Obama should have fun juggling these turds.


15 posted on 03/19/2009 5:11:41 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson