Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

You don’t have to pay taxes on wealth you have already accumulated, only on income. That would be immoral, to put it mildly. Why should you have pay “rent” on money or property you have already earned?

In a saner world you’d pay taxes on what you spent, but that seems unlikely.


75 posted on 03/19/2009 10:19:05 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray

“You don’t have to pay taxes on wealth you have already accumulated”

Really? - I paid more than $10,000 in taxes on what I’ve acumulated last year.

You also said that they “can’t” tax corporations, yet corporations get hit with 39% fed, and 11% state taxes here.

The rich aren’t paying those taxes, the working class is.


78 posted on 03/19/2009 10:36:50 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson