To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
It is the same as asking the gentleman, Do you believe the world is flat?' and he doesn't answer on religious grounds, said Dr. Alters. Or gravity, or plate tectonics, or that the Earth goes around the sun.Exactly. Said Minister should lose his job.
5 posted on
03/18/2009 7:45:33 AM PDT by
jalisco555
("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
To: jalisco555
Exactly. Said Minister should lose his job. Sorry, but no. Goodyear should be graded on the merit of his actual job performance.
To: jalisco555
Said Minister should lose his job.
So say the "thought police".
27 posted on
03/18/2009 8:55:45 AM PDT by
Sopater
(I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
To: jalisco555
How does a Chiro-cracker get appointed to a Science Post anyway?
Chiropractors are to Science...
As a back massage is to a cure for cancer.
33 posted on
03/18/2009 10:00:37 AM PDT by
allmendream
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
To: jalisco555
So you think a person’s religious beliefs should be scrutinized and laid bare as a qualification of public service?
Also, Dr. Alters analogy is not true. Believing the world is flat and believing in creation are not akin and there’s not controversy in her comparisons, with creation, there is controversy.
41 posted on
03/18/2009 10:59:39 AM PDT by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: jalisco555
It is the same as asking the gentleman, Do you believe the world is flat?' and he doesn't answer on religious grounds, said Dr. Alters. Or gravity, or plate tectonics, or that the Earth goes around the sun. No, it's not the same. The ToE is not even in the same league as those other areas.
The macroevolution is based on the interpretation of the forensic evidence found in the fossil record. The kind of species to species change that is claimed by evos have never been observed but only assumed based on the fossil record.
I figured that the evos would want his head on a platter for not comforming to their world view, just like others whose careers have been ruined by the *scientific* community for not purporting the correct doctrinal position.
75 posted on
03/18/2009 3:18:00 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: jalisco555; Ethan Clive Osgoode; GodGunsGuts
I’d say that the misister has proven his qualifications for the job with that statement.
Those that wrap themselves in the naturalist religion of evolution are prone to ignoring the abundant evidence that refutes their religious beliefs, thus crippling much of biology by diverting funds for research into dead end projects.
76 posted on
03/18/2009 3:18:31 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: jalisco555
It is the same as asking the gentleman, Do you believe the world is flat?' and he doesn't answer on religious grounds, said Dr. Alters. Or gravity, or plate tectonics, or that the Earth goes around the sun. So why doesn't anybody ask those questions?
117 posted on
03/19/2009 6:50:22 AM PDT by
Tribune7
(Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson