[Mr. Wright]

Here is the amazing part of this entire issue. 1961, 48 years ago, is not all that long ago. In essence, some or all of the Doctors and/or nurses that were then present his birth, should, for all intent and purposes, be alive today. Why is it that neither one Doctor, nor one nurse, has come forward stating that they were present at Barry's birth. Any such assertion could easily be verified by affirming historical records in hospital logs.

[Non-Sequitur]

Any such assertion could easily be verified by affirming historical records in hospital logs.

If any such logs or records existed from that time then couldn't they confirm Obama was born there without needing a nurse or doctor to say they witnessed it?

[little jeremiah]

Note my comment above.

[afnamvet]

I believe we can safely assume ALLrecords having to do with any paper trail are either destroyed or under lock and key. Hospital records, nurse station logs and doctor's entries suffered the same fate.

A narcissist and/or his handlers will verify there is no damning evidence to surface as a threat to him and to his perceived throne.

[sometime lurker]

Why is it that neither one Doctor, nor one nurse, has come forward stating that they were present at Barry's birth.

From my experience, two reasons.

1. Most docs and nurses don't remember the names or details of deliveries (except for medical details) unless they have an ongoing relationship with the mother or child. I only delivered 20 or 30 babies, and I wouldn't know if I delivered someone famous or not. I can only imagine the difficult remembering for an OB GYN who has done thousands of deliveries.

2. It is illegal to give out any medical information - including identifying someone as a patient - without a release from the patient. Even death doesn't change that, you need a release from the administrator or executor of the estate.